Monday, November 27, 2006

 

Rogerian Persuasion

We've been talking in class about a range of arguments--a range that falls between the use of coercion or force (such as in war) versus the use of persuasion or seduction (such as in advertising).

Between these two poles are various degrees of both, with the use of rational argument or law (such as in a legal case) in the middle of this range.

The use of persuasion concerns us now. And one of the best to teach this human art is the psychologist Carl Rogers. Rogers discovered in his counseling practice that the best way to help others was through being "client-oriented" or "person-oriented." This meant listening and reflecting what another was doing or saying, empathizing with and respecting him or her, and finding some congruence with this person.

You will be using the Rogerian Argument in your next essay. This method prefers dialogue over debate. The goal in this method is not winning an argument; it is instead creating effective communication. Please identify the four parts in the Rogerian Argument (click on the link). Why is the Rogerian Approach so effective in emotionally charged arguments?


Monday, November 06, 2006

 

Analyzing Advertisements

It's hard to ignore the constant advertising coming at us every day--maybe because it's everywhere! Our lives are flooded with advertisements from the radio and television, from websites and emails, from magazines and mailings, from outdoor signs and billboards, and even from objects used to hold products (as with this old Coca-Cola "cold box" ) and even from the products themselves.

I believe that if we don't know how to deal with advertisements, they will suck us into deals we should avoid. How do I know? I've been sucked in many times because I thought a product would make me feel better or make me more attractive. Yet the best way to deal with the amazing wooing power of advertisements is to step back and start with analysis. Analysis is a powerful thinking tool that we can use to break apart its object and in this case, advertisements.

I've always believed Aristotle was the best place to begin with analysis. As I have emphasized in class, start by using Aristotle's topics of invention to break apart any object or idea and you will have success.

But there is more. Analysis of an advertisement requires understanding its appeals. And since advertising is essentially a persuasive argument attempting to convince a person to buy or do something, I say we should begin with Aristotle's three appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos). The Greek philosopher identified these appeals as the core elements to any successful argument. Study these appeals, for they are critical to any final analysis of an advertisement.

With advertising, I believe we have to look at some other tricks of the trade too, namely the kinds of hooks advertisers use to engage their audience. Some of these are the following:



This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?